|

Is It Graffiti or Is It Art?
Student Perspective/ Public Art
By Frank "Bennett" Sims '08
POMONA COLLEGE HAS BEEN, TO PUT IT IN THE LEAST ALARMING WAY, INVADED BY
FACES. George W. Bush, Hermann Munster, Iggy Pop, et al.—the faces of
pop culture
icons have been carefully stenciled and spray-painted in and around art
buildings, on bathroom floors and onto Walker Wall. While being leered
at by Munster on one’s way to class may be slightly uncomfortable, the
phenomenon is, for the most part, innocuous. The only face that really
gives pause is Iggy’s. On the outside of Walker Wall, the seminal punk
rocker’s face hovers just below the caption, “You people make me sick.”
The particular image used for the stencil (the album cover, actually, of
1992’s Lust For Life) is of a boyishly grinning Iggy—not of the
strung-out-and-aboutto-vomit Iggy who uttered these same words moments
before showering his audience with bile at a Stooges concert in 1971. So
the ironic juxtaposition of “boyish grin” with “You people make me sick”
is worth a chuckle, true. But who are “you people”? “We people” don’t
make Munster sick, so why Iggy?
That, presumably, depends on the question of authorship: Was a feverish,
mono-positive Pomona student made physically ill by peers? Or a
Claremont McKenna student revolted by Pomona culture? Or a local
community member revolted by the 5-Cs in general? What’s
this all about, anyway?
Since he noticed it two years ago, Ronald Nemo, the College’s
horticulturalist and assistant supervisor of grounds, has assumed that
Iggy was the work of a Pomona student. While local community members do
occasionally spray-paint gang insignias and other graffiti on Walker
Wall in the summers, the work is typically of a cruder sort than the
neatly stenciled Iggy.
And, besides, the students in charge of giving Walker Wall—where
students are allowed to paint club announcements, public art and general
wackiness—a new coat of whitewash at the end of each year have chosen,
so far, to let Iggy be. This, combined with the facts that (a) Campus
Life has never told Nemo to paint over it and (b) Nemo actually finds
the face/slogan kind of cool, has spared Iggy from the groundskeepers’
“graffiti treatment,” in which SOP is to paint over ASAP.
But how do groundskeepers distinguish between “graffiti” and “public
art”? According to Nemo, whenever they notice anything (1) that could
deface property, (2) that employs vulgar language, or (3) that’s clearly
nonstudent-originated (e.g., the insignias spray-painted onto Walker
Wall in the summers), they treat it as “graffiti.” Number (1) is a
pretty capacious category. For instance, Mufti burgers, those
Riddler-esque stickers that allude to campus politics via puns and
quadruple entendres, are considered “borderline” because of how
potentially damaging their glue is to paint and plaster. They can stay
up for a day, just to get the message across, but no longer. Likewise, a
recent graduate’s Saussurean art project
in the spring of 2005, which involved placing dozens of small “Sign”
stickers on everything from stop signs to bathroom signs, was
“overwhelming” for the groundskeepers, who did their best to remove the
potentially damaging stickers. Still, (2) and (3) are clear enough, and,
feeding Iggy through Nemo’s criteria, one can at least determine that he
isn’t “graffiti”—that is, he isn’t ruining property or offending anyone,
and it’s likely enough that he’s a Pomona student’s artwork.
The Mufti burgers and “Sign” stickers seem to be walking a nominal
balance beam, though. Are they “graffiti” or “public art”? And what’s
the difference?
Frances Pohl, a Pomona College art historian whose job it is to think
about just these sorts of questions, hadn’t taken serious note of the
faces before they were brought to her attention. “They’re so subtle and
inoffensive,” she said, from behind an authoritative and thoroughly
intimidating pile of books and papers on her desk, “that I didn’t
actually notice them as anything particularly meaningful
… Art students are always putting little things up.” These “little
things”—i.e. the public art projects that are a strong presence on
Pomona’s campus—comprise murals, spray-paintings, sculptures and even
installation pieces in bathrooms. Apropos the bathroom installations,
Pohl qualified, “But (this) was part of a class project, and (the
students) let people know they were doing this, or they did it in such a
way that no one was outraged or offended, and then they went and cleaned
it up.”
These measures distinguish these particular art students from Mufti,
whose damaging glue has frustrated Pomona staff since at least the
1960s, when a College dean offered to post the messages himself to
prevent further harm, and from the “Sign” project, whose author failed
to let people (viz. the groundskeepers) know about his plans ahead of
time.
The distinction being made isn’t an aesthetic one, then, but one of
responsibility. “Where’s the aesthetic difference between an Iggy Pop
face and a ‘graffiti’ tag?” Pohl asks. “(The) thing about people doing
actions in public spaces—it’s a question of, ‘What is the effect on the
physical space itself and the people who move through it?’”
The fact that Iggy is on Walker Wall, a designated safe-space for Pomona
student artwork, signals a kind of “letting people know”—one expects
works like him around there. And he doesn’t seem to be outraging or
offending anyone, except insofar as a student’s unease at making him
sick might be called “outrage.”
What’s more, it will be Pomona students who whitewash the wall and
paint over him, if that ever happens, so they are, in a manner, assuming
the responsibility of “cleaning him up.” Bearing this in mind, one can
say that Iggy fulfills Pohl’s three criteria. “Graffiti” or not, Iggy,
like the statues, frescoes and murals that grace Pomona’s campus,
constitutes a reasonably responsible piece of “public art.” But is it a
“good” one?
“The good thing about (public art),” Pohl suggests, “is that it makes us
aware of the public spaces that we move through.” That’s a gold star for
Iggy, then—he does, after all, make Pomona students daily aware of the
fact that their public space sickens him.
|
|